<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	> <channel><title>Comments on: Propaganda Department Bans Online Distribution of Obama Interview (With Photos)</title> <atom:link href="http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/</link> <description>Watching China Politics from Cyberspace</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: BiggerBiggerPicture</title><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/#comment-13474</link> <dc:creator>BiggerBiggerPicture</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:48:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=47731#comment-13474</guid> <description>Caryanne, unless you provide verifiable examples, you are spreading rumors. If you do spread rumors, you are the enemy of Chinese people. You&#039;d better leave this site and go mess with someone else.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caryanne, unless you provide verifiable examples, you are spreading rumors. If you do spread rumors, you are the enemy of Chinese people. You&#8217;d better leave this site and go mess with someone else.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: carryanne</title><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/#comment-13473</link> <dc:creator>carryanne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:38:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=47731#comment-13473</guid> <description>I can see, and I am not surprised that you are unaware of what torture and murder goes on in China, it&#039;s terrifying.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see, and I am not surprised that you are unaware of what torture and murder goes on in China, it&#8217;s terrifying.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: js</title><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/#comment-13466</link> <dc:creator>js</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=47731#comment-13466</guid> <description>Whoever is reporting this is a joke. The Whitehouse published the transcript and its the same as the Southern Weekend. Nor was it banned.http://zonaeuropa.com/200911c.brief.htm#004</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever is reporting this is a joke. The Whitehouse published the transcript and its the same as the Southern Weekend. Nor was it banned.</p><p><a href="http://zonaeuropa.com/200911c.brief.htm#004" rel="nofollow">http://zonaeuropa.com/200911c.brief.htm#004</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: China Law &#38; Policy &#187; The Obama Visit to China – What the U.S. Press Missed</title><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/#comment-13464</link> <dc:creator>China Law &#38; Policy &#187; The Obama Visit to China – What the U.S. Press Missed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:13:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=47731#comment-13464</guid> <description>[...] in his letter written to China’s Southern Weekend newspaper, President Obama stressed the importance of a free [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in his letter written to China’s Southern Weekend newspaper, President Obama stressed the importance of a free [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BiggerBiggerPicture</title><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/#comment-13446</link> <dc:creator>BiggerBiggerPicture</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:46:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=47731#comment-13446</guid> <description>Here is a way to tell if a country&#039;s involvement with other country&#039;s human rights is legitimate:If the human rights violation is gross, then it is legitimate.Otherwise, it is more like the involvement is trying interfere other country&#039;s internal affairs with ulterior reasons.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a way to tell if a country&#8217;s involvement with other country&#8217;s human rights is legitimate:</p><p>If the human rights violation is gross, then it is legitimate.</p><p>Otherwise, it is more like the involvement is trying interfere other country&#8217;s internal affairs with ulterior reasons.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BiggerBiggerPicture</title><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/#comment-13441</link> <dc:creator>BiggerBiggerPicture</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:21:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=47731#comment-13441</guid> <description>Carryanne,You need to disclose who you really are. It appears that you just want to instigate troubles.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carryanne,</p><p>You need to disclose who you really are. It appears that you just want to instigate troubles.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: carryanne</title><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/#comment-13440</link> <dc:creator>carryanne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:12:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=47731#comment-13440</guid> <description>Big,SO what if Obama was undermining the party&#039;s rule?  To me, that sounds brilliant.  Undermining the party&#039;s rule means human rights and liberties which the party is opposite of.  If Chinese people truly loved living in torture cages, I wouldn&#039;t say anything, but since I know the voices of the persecuted are forbidden to be heard, I am happy if Obama is speaking to CHINA instead of just sucking up to the PARTY which claims to BE China, but of course it is not such thing!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big,</p><p>SO what if Obama was undermining the party&#8217;s rule?  To me, that sounds brilliant.  Undermining the party&#8217;s rule means human rights and liberties which the party is opposite of.  If Chinese people truly loved living in torture cages, I wouldn&#8217;t say anything, but since I know the voices of the persecuted are forbidden to be heard, I am happy if Obama is speaking to CHINA instead of just sucking up to the PARTY which claims to BE China, but of course it is not such thing!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BiggerBiggerPicture</title><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/#comment-13439</link> <dc:creator>BiggerBiggerPicture</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:03:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=47731#comment-13439</guid> <description>The communist party is smart enough to tell behind Obama&#039;s smile, he was really trying to undermine the party&#039;s rule. So, they censored him. Next time, he visit China, he will learn to mind his own business instead of trying to take some cheap shots. Other countries are never arrogant enough to come to the US and criticize the US&#039; problem. Be aware of the US&#039; intention is a wise thing to do.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The communist party is smart enough to tell behind Obama&#8217;s smile, he was really trying to undermine the party&#8217;s rule. So, they censored him. Next time, he visit China, he will learn to mind his own business instead of trying to take some cheap shots. Other countries are never arrogant enough to come to the US and criticize the US&#8217; problem. Be aware of the US&#8217; intention is a wise thing to do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SalmonFish</title><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/#comment-13434</link> <dc:creator>SalmonFish</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:54:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=47731#comment-13434</guid> <description>This action on the part of the Chinese government is certainly worth some serious examination. Why is it that the CCP (or at least some of its factions/ministries/actors) are still so paranoid about this sort of thing? This could have been used as positive force in the development of China&#039;s civic society but it was not: a demonstration of how people and leaders can interact and debate in a TRULY HARMONIOUS way...@State Secret&quot;Who&#039;s worse Mao or Obama?&quot;One of the most ridiculous questions I&#039;ve seen in a long time: are you being serious? Maybe Stalin, Hitler and Kim Jong-Il should also be in the running? These opinions exhibit a bizarre combination the worst elements or arrogant Anglo-American patriotism and believe-anything ignorant conspiracy theorism...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This action on the part of the Chinese government is certainly worth some serious examination. Why is it that the CCP (or at least some of its factions/ministries/actors) are still so paranoid about this sort of thing? This could have been used as positive force in the development of China&#8217;s civic society but it was not: a demonstration of how people and leaders can interact and debate in a TRULY HARMONIOUS way&#8230;</p><p>@State Secret</p><p>&#8220;Who&#8217;s worse Mao or Obama?&#8221;</p><p>One of the most ridiculous questions I&#8217;ve seen in a long time: are you being serious? Maybe Stalin, Hitler and Kim Jong-Il should also be in the running? These opinions exhibit a bizarre combination the worst elements or arrogant Anglo-American patriotism and believe-anything ignorant conspiracy theorism&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Twitter Tweets about Obama as of 21. november 2009 &#171; Super links</title><link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/#comment-13433</link> <dc:creator>Twitter Tweets about Obama as of 21. november 2009 &#171; Super links</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:28:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=47731#comment-13433</guid> <description>[...] &#8230; 2009-11-21 14:17:32 &#183; Reply &#183; View    paulmasonnews: http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/ How China banned circulation of Obama interview 2009-11-21 14:17:25 &#183; Reply &#183; View    [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8230; 2009-11-21 14:17:32 &middot; Reply &middot; View    paulmasonnews: <a href="http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/" rel="nofollow">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/11/propaganda-department-bans-obama-interview/</a> How China banned circulation of Obama interview 2009-11-21 14:17:25 &middot; Reply &middot; View    [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 4/8 queries in 0.019 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 605/611 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdt.chinadigitaltime.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: chinadigitaltimes.net @ 2012-02-10 23:48:52 -->
