<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bear in a China Shop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/05/bear-in-a-china-shop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/05/bear-in-a-china-shop/</link>
	<description>Watching China Politics from Cyberspace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Wade</title>
		<link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/05/bear-in-a-china-shop/#comment-59094</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=136689#comment-59094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It makes no attempt to be a piece of &quot;objective journalism&quot;: it&#039;s an op-ed piece from Foreign Policy&#039;s Argument section.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes no attempt to be a piece of &#8220;objective journalism&#8221;: it&#8217;s an op-ed piece from Foreign Policy&#8217;s Argument section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanabi</title>
		<link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/05/bear-in-a-china-shop/#comment-59089</link>
		<dc:creator>hanabi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 04:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=136689#comment-59089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I&#039;m personally of the opinion that no one can in honesty deny China&#039;s social problems, Mr. Kroeber should nevertheless choose his words more carefully. Is he implying, with the sentence &quot;[China] will &quot;remain&quot; a &quot;second-rate society,&quot;&quot; that the object of comparion, the US, is a &quot;first-rate society&quot;? 

Mr. Krober is entitled to his beliefs, but an objective journalist should exercise more thought with his or her vocabulary.

I&#039;m slightly disappointed that CDT chose to add this one to the archive; it fails as a piece of objective journalism and falls instead under the too rampant US-clout-stroking category. I hadn&#039;t realized this was what CDT was geared towards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m personally of the opinion that no one can in honesty deny China&#8217;s social problems, Mr. Kroeber should nevertheless choose his words more carefully. Is he implying, with the sentence &#8220;[China] will &#8220;remain&#8221; a &#8220;second-rate society,&#8221;" that the object of comparion, the US, is a &#8220;first-rate society&#8221;? </p>
<p>Mr. Krober is entitled to his beliefs, but an objective journalist should exercise more thought with his or her vocabulary.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m slightly disappointed that CDT chose to add this one to the archive; it fails as a piece of objective journalism and falls instead under the too rampant US-clout-stroking category. I hadn&#8217;t realized this was what CDT was geared towards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc

 Served from: chinadigitaltimes.net @ 2013-06-18 21:07:43 by W3 Total Cache -->