Chen Guangcheng: “They Are Scared of the Countryside”

Ian Johnson interviews dissident Chen Guangcheng in a New York University classroom. Continuing the transcript style of his Bao Tong interview, Johnson asks Chen many probing questions, from China’s incoming leadership to grassroots political consciousness and spiritual awareness: Ian Johnson:How do you account for Chinese officials’ frequent disregard of China’s own laws? Is it a lack of checks and balances—that officials think they can get away with anything so they do anything? Chen Guangcheng: It’s also that they don’t dare do the right thing and don’t dare not do the wrong thing. Chinese police and prosecutors, do you think they don’t understand Chinese law? They definitely understand. But these people illegally kept me under detention. They all knew [that what they were doing was illegal] but they didn’t dare take a step to rectify the situation. They weren’t able to. Why is it like this? A Xinhua News Agency journalist came and saw me twice; as a result he lost his job. So you can see that once you enter the system, you need to become bad. If you don’t become bad, you can’t survive. Chen also argues that some dissidents and China observers overlook urban-rural differences: There’s nothing positive about urbanization? I think for those who go to the city and work there’s a benefit. But the current way of villages being turned into towns—I don’t think there’s an advantage to that. People in the village often rely on ordinary kinds of labor to earn a living, like working in the fields, or raising geese or fish and things like that. So now what happens? They turn a village into one high-rise apartment building and that’s all that’s left of the village. Then the land is used for real estate projects controlled by the officials. Where are the people ...
« Back to Article

One Response to Chen Guangcheng: “They Are Scared of the Countryside”

  1. Will says:

    Indeed, what motivates many if not most of these harsh CCP crackdowns on real or imagined opposition to one-party authoritarian rule is the fear of losing one’s “official cap”–or even one’s head–if opposition to the unaccountable government were allowed to grow as it did in Spring 1989. There is seldom any consideration of the fact that the vast majority of (former) communist officials in the USSR and eastern Europe were not punished (other than losing their privileges as members of the nomenklatura) after the one-party Leninist regimes fell.