<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Sichuan Earthquake Likely Man-Made</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/12/2008-sichuan-earthquake-likely-man-made/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/12/2008-sichuan-earthquake-likely-man-made/</link>
	<description>Watching China Politics from Cyberspace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:20:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Wade</title>
		<link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/12/2008-sichuan-earthquake-likely-man-made/#comment-64039</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=148198#comment-64039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see how it&#039;s &quot;anti-China&quot;. I specifically chose a passage from the study&#039;s conclusion that described the disaster as &quot;an unprecedented case … that presents huge challenges for scientific theory&quot;, potentially redefining the whole field. In other words, there&#039;s no way this result could have been anticipated, so no one&#039;s alleging negligence, let alone malice. The point, as I said in the intro, is that if the dangers from reservoir-induced seismicity are greater or less predictable than formerly believed, that needs to be borne in mind in the future.

Thanks for the link, I&#039;ll take a look.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how it&#8217;s &#8220;anti-China&#8221;. I specifically chose a passage from the study&#8217;s conclusion that described the disaster as &#8220;an unprecedented case … that presents huge challenges for scientific theory&#8221;, potentially redefining the whole field. In other words, there&#8217;s no way this result could have been anticipated, so no one&#8217;s alleging negligence, let alone malice. The point, as I said in the intro, is that if the dangers from reservoir-induced seismicity are greater or less predictable than formerly believed, that needs to be borne in mind in the future.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link, I&#8217;ll take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChasL</title>
		<link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/12/2008-sichuan-earthquake-likely-man-made/#comment-63961</link>
		<dc:creator>ChasL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 06:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=148198#comment-63961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samuel, this has got to be one of the biggest anti-China BS you&#039;ve written. It&#039;s already proven fact the 8.0 quake was not caused by the dam. Fan Xiao&#039;s clain has long been debunked.

Sichuan provincial Earthquake Administration Reservoir Earthquake Research Institute&#039;s Hu Xianping published in &lt;&gt; in June 2007.  The article was titled .  Obviously, Hu Xianming was talking about 735 magnitude 0.9-3.6 earthquakes that occurred before the Zipingpu dam began to store water.

240-meter-high Ertan Dam built in 1999 on the Yalongjiang River has a total storage capacity of 5.8 billion cubic meters; the 132-meter-high Baozhusi Dam has a total storage capacity of 2.6 billion cubic meters. &quot;All those dams have never induced a destructive earthquake measuring above six degrees on the Richter scale, not to mention an 8.0-magnitude one like the Wenchuan quake]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel, this has got to be one of the biggest anti-China BS you&#8217;ve written. It&#8217;s already proven fact the 8.0 quake was not caused by the dam. Fan Xiao&#8217;s clain has long been debunked.</p>
<p>Sichuan provincial Earthquake Administration Reservoir Earthquake Research Institute&#8217;s Hu Xianping published in &lt;&gt; in June 2007.  The article was titled .  Obviously, Hu Xianming was talking about 735 magnitude 0.9-3.6 earthquakes that occurred before the Zipingpu dam began to store water.</p>
<p>240-meter-high Ertan Dam built in 1999 on the Yalongjiang River has a total storage capacity of 5.8 billion cubic meters; the 132-meter-high Baozhusi Dam has a total storage capacity of 2.6 billion cubic meters. &#8220;All those dams have never induced a destructive earthquake measuring above six degrees on the Richter scale, not to mention an 8.0-magnitude one like the Wenchuan quake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/12/2008-sichuan-earthquake-likely-man-made/#comment-60553</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=148198#comment-60553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This study by Probe International deserves to be publicized more widely, even worldwide, both to aid in the management of existing hydropower dams and in the decision-making process for siting new hydropower dams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study by Probe International deserves to be publicized more widely, even worldwide, both to aid in the management of existing hydropower dams and in the decision-making process for siting new hydropower dams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Wade</title>
		<link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/12/2008-sichuan-earthquake-likely-man-made/#comment-60310</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=148198#comment-60310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s the mass of the water in the reservoir, rather than of the dam itself, that&#039;s the issue. The paper states that fluctuations in the reservoir level over the two years leading up to the quake repeatedly loaded and unloaded around 740 million tonnes of water.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the mass of the water in the reservoir, rather than of the dam itself, that&#8217;s the issue. The paper states that fluctuations in the reservoir level over the two years leading up to the quake repeatedly loaded and unloaded around 740 million tonnes of water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Davey</title>
		<link>http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/12/2008-sichuan-earthquake-likely-man-made/#comment-60304</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Davey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinadigitaltimes.net/?p=148198#comment-60304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is ther anyway I could get info on the mass of the dam?Or approx Weight??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is ther anyway I could get info on the mass of the dam?Or approx Weight??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc

 Served from: chinadigitaltimes.net @ 2013-05-26 00:03:26 by W3 Total Cache -->