Harmony Particles: Rebranding Air Pollution

As Beijing splutters under a combined smog blanket and sandstorm, China Daily reports a new initiative to choose a Chinese name for PM2.5 (sub-2.5 micrometer) pollutant particles: Because PM 2.5 uses the Latin alphabet, the China National Committee for Terms in Sciences and Technologies is conducting research and gauging opinions from all walks of life to name the term properly, it said. People nationwide are contributing creative terms, including ‘Beijing grey’, ‘toxic dust’, ‘air pollution index’ and ‘cough trigger’. In addition to the people who are busy brainstorming, some also suggest that the government should focus more on relieving the dense smog rather than providing a fancy name. PM2.5 was among 239 English terms and abbreviations whose inclusion in a new edition of the Contemporary Chinese Dictionary last year prompted a letter of protest from more than 100 scholars. GDP and NBA were also seen as linguistic pollutants threatening the long-term health of Chinese script, but globalization and pinyin text input make the Roman alphabet’s excision unlikely. Some netizens took the issue less seriously. From a selection by Southern Metropolis Daily, via CDT Chinese: @_vivo:建议叫国民体质辅助进化颗粒2.5(超微无害型)。 @_vivo: Let’s call them national fitness supplement particles 2.5 (of the extremely small and non-harmful variety). @魏世江:砖家不把心思放在污染治理上,净干些没用的事。有本事把所有数学教科书上的符号全改成中文,把所有化学反应方程式也用中文,再牛逼点,你把所有计算机教科书上的程序代码都改成中文啊? @weishijiang: These bricksperts aren’t thinking about pollution control, they’re just wasting their time. Why not change all the symbols into math textbooks into Chinese characters, or all the formulae for chemical reactions … even better, why not change all the programming code in computer textbooks into Chinese script? @萍心而论:看评论笑死我了,北京致咳物、毒尘、下午两点半、北京灰、小250……我觉得吧,砖家可能是想把PM2.5当宠物养了。不明白一个已被大家理解并接受的词汇,再改成别的名又有何意义。 @pingxinerlun: I’m laughing my head off at this discussion: Beijing cough particles, toxic dust, 2:30 p.m., Beijing gray, Little 250 … I think these bricksperts might be planning to raise the PM2.5 particles as pets. I don’t see the point in changing a term that everyone already understands and ...
« Back to Article

Comments are closed.