{"id":119292,"date":"2011-03-11T16:56:11","date_gmt":"2011-03-11T23:56:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/?p=119292"},"modified":"2011-03-11T16:56:11","modified_gmt":"2011-03-11T23:56:11","slug":"china-wins-wto-case-against-u-s","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2011\/03\/china-wins-wto-case-against-u-s\/","title":{"rendered":"China Wins WTO Case Against U.S."},"content":{"rendered":"
In the past few years, in response from pressure from domestic unions, the United States has levied a series of additional duties on various Chinese products. The World Trade Organization initially ruled in favor of the US ability to do so, but the Chinese have appealed this decision (see more background here<\/a>). A new WTO ruling\u00a0 out today<\/a> supports Chinese claims that these duties are against WTO regulations. From Market Watch:<\/p>\n The World Trade Organization Friday handed an important victory to China, ruling that the U.S. illegally imposed both anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties on some Chinese exports in 2007.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The trade body’s decision sets a precedent in limiting the ability of China’s trading partners to impose punitive duties on its exports.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Beijing appealed, arguing the U.S. couldn’t legally impose two different classes of punitive duties\u2014anti-dumping and anti-subsidy\u2014on the same goods.Most countries, the U.S. included, do not consider China a market economy, and therefore usually don’t apply anti-subsidy duties. The EU has never imposed anti-subsidy duties on China.Beijing has been campaigning hard for market-economy status from both the U.S. and EU because it would make it harder for those countries to levy anti-dumping duties.<\/p>\n In its 232-page report, the WTO’s judges said that the U.S. couldn’t apply both kinds of duties.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n