{"id":16065,"date":"2007-12-15T21:43:10","date_gmt":"2007-12-16T04:43:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2007\/12\/15\/the-truth-is-more-endangered-than-tigers-in-china\/"},"modified":"2009-01-30T12:03:26","modified_gmt":"2009-01-30T19:03:26","slug":"the-truth-is-more-endangered-than-tigers-in-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2007\/12\/the-truth-is-more-endangered-than-tigers-in-china\/","title":{"rendered":"“The Truth is More Endangered than Tigers in China”"},"content":{"rendered":"
The “<\/span>South China Tiger<\/a>” [<\/span>\u534e\u5357<\/span>\u864e\uff3d<\/span>saga continues. Now known as “Tigergate” among Chinese netizens, this event will no doubt be one of the top media\/internet stories of 2007. On December 2nd, NetEase (one of China’s leading news portals) published <\/span>all 40 digital photos<\/a> that farmer Zhou Zhenglong alleged he took of the tiger and also published six independent experts’ evaluations of the authenticity of these photos. These six independent third party evaluations include no less than American Chinese criminologist <\/span>Henry Lee<\/a> (<\/span>\u674e\u660c<\/span>\u94b0<\/span>), the <\/span>China Photographers Association<\/a> (CPA)’s digital photo authentification center, and China’s top South China Tiger expert Hu Huijian (<\/span>\u80e1\u6167\u5efa<\/a>). And all of their evaluations of the tiger photo reached the same conclusion: they’re fake.<\/p>\n <\/span>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \nTwo days after the Netease evaluation came out, on December 4, the State Forestry Administration (SFA) had a press conference and its spokesperson dodged questions from journalists about the authenticity of those photos, and only vaguely hinted that the responsibility of these photos is in the hands of the Shaanxi government and Shaanxi Forestry Office. The spokesperson said the State Forestry Administration (SFA) would not “go beyond its position” to evaluate authenticity of these photos. At the end of the press conference, the deputy director of the State Forestry Administration (SFA), Zhu Lieke said: “There are a lot of photographs of the Loch Ness Monster<\/a> in the museum. People care about the existence of the monster rather than the authenticity of the photos.” This response again generated furious criticism from netizens. In one online survey<\/a>, participated in by 71,000 Internet users, 90% of participants were not satisfied with the government’s response.\n<\/p>\n \nOn December 8th, CCTV’s News Investigation program had a full hour program entitled: “Questions on the Photos of the Huanan Tiger<\/a>.” The anchor Chai Jing (\u67f4\u9759<\/a>) interviewed all related parties and her sharp questions and investigation further revealed the inconsistencies in Zhou Zhenglong’s and local officials’ denials and obscuring of the truth.\n<\/p>\n \nCDT’s Fan Linjun translated the following article, by Wang Heyan, from Caijing Magazine on December 11, 2007, which illustrates that the significance of this “Tigergate” event has gone beyond the authenticity of a group of digital photos. Rather, it is a reflection of the existing crisis of public trust in China society.\n<\/p>\n\n