{"id":16156,"date":"2007-12-22T20:10:05","date_gmt":"2007-12-23T03:10:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2007\/12\/22\/a-toy-makers-conscience-jonathan-dee\/"},"modified":"2007-12-22T20:10:05","modified_gmt":"2007-12-23T03:10:05","slug":"a-toy-makers-conscience-jonathan-dee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2007\/12\/a-toy-makers-conscience-jonathan-dee\/","title":{"rendered":"A Toy Maker’s Conscience – Jonathan Dee"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n<\/a>\n<\/p>\n \nBusiness professor Prakash Sethi has spent the last several years monitoring the working conditions in Mattel’s Chinese toy factories. Jonathan Dee writes in the New York Times Magazine<\/em>:\n<\/p>\n \nIf Mattel were simply a greedy or sloppy company that got caught doing something it shouldn’t and paid the price, its story, and Sethi’s, would be a lot less interesting. But the fact is that Mattel — largely under Sethi’s direction — has gone further than any other company to be a good corporate citizen with regard to its Chinese operations. For the last decade its factories have operated under an unparalleled degree of oversight, at least concerning wages and working conditions. And it still wasn’t enough. The past several months have provided an object lesson in the inherent limits — its sterner critics would say the fundamental hypocrisy — of Mattel’s efforts to lessen the bad side effects of its global search for cheap labor and maximum profit. [Full text]<\/a>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n \nThe object lesson Dee refers to consists of the huge toy recalls<\/a> of earlier this year. But Dee’s article isn’t the only story on Chinese toy manufacturing to arrive in time for Christmas.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n