{"id":165901,"date":"2013-11-26T12:29:14","date_gmt":"2013-11-26T20:29:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/?p=165901"},"modified":"2013-11-26T12:39:44","modified_gmt":"2013-11-26T20:39:44","slug":"nine-detained-qingdao-pipeline-death-toll-rises","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2013\/11\/nine-detained-qingdao-pipeline-death-toll-rises\/","title":{"rendered":"Nine Detained as Qingdao Pipeline Death Toll Rises"},"content":{"rendered":"
In the wake of the\u00a0Sinopec oil pipeline that exploded on the outskirts of Qingdao<\/a>\u00a0last Friday, the death toll has risen to 55 and nine people have been detained<\/a><\/strong>. BBC reports:<\/p>\n Police in China have arrested nine people in relation to explosions that killed 55 people, state media report.<\/p>\n The blasts in the eastern city of Qingdao took place on Friday, after a leaking oil pipeline owned by oil refiner Sinopec caught fire.<\/p>\n Seven of those arrested were Sinopec employees, while two came from the city’s economic and technological development zone, Xinhua reported.<\/p>\n The explosions injured at least 160 people, with nine people still missing. [Source<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n At least seven of those detained are employees of the state-owned China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, also known as Sinopec Limited<\/strong><\/a>. From Bloomberg Businessweek:<\/p>\n Chinese authorities detained seven people from China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. (386), the nation\u2019s biggest refiner, after at least 55 died in a pipeline blast.<\/p>\n The personnel from Sinopec, as the refiner is known, and two from an economic development zone in China\u2019s eastern Qingdao city were detained by police, the city\u2019s Huangdao district government said yesterday on its\u00a0official microblog.<\/p>\n The explosion and crude oil leak on Nov. 22, the deadliest since at least 2005, adds to a growing toll from industrial accidents that\u2019s building pressure for better safety standards and management. It shines a spotlight\u00a0on management of state-owned energy companies after the government pledged this month to allow more private investment as part of the biggest reforms since the 1990s.<\/p>\n \u201cSomeone has to be accountable for what has happened,\u201d said Laban Yu, a Hong Kong-based analyst at Jefferies Group LLC. \u201cSinopec executives can only escape with minor punishment if investigation concludes that local government was at least equally responsible for the accident.\u201d [Source<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Xi Jinping traveled to Qingdao<\/a> after the accident, where he called for increased scrutiny of the pipeline industry, and pledged “zero-tolerance” for safety violations<\/strong><\/a>. From the Wall Street Journal:<\/p>\n Chinese President\u00a0Xi Jinping<\/a>\u00a0called deadly pipeline blasts on Friday a wake-up call for increased scrutiny of the nation\u2019s network of pipelines.<\/p>\n The official Xinhua news agency\u00a0quoted the Chinese president<\/a>\u00a0as saying on Sunday that\u00a0safety\u00a0must\u00a0be\u00a0improved in the pipeline industry, and he called for stronger inspections and punishments for violations. Mr. Xi added that pipeline operators should continue to carry out inspections and enforce a \u201czero-tolerance\u201d policy for violations.<\/p>\n There should also be surprise inspections, he said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Friday’s explosion came hours after a leak in the pipeline was reported. At the New York Times, Austin Ramzy rounds up Chinese media reports asking if better evacuation procedures could have reduced the death toll<\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n \u201cIn the seven hours from the leak to the explosion, did residents know a leak had occurred?\u201d The Beijing Youth Daily, an official newspaper,\u00a0asked<\/a>\u00a0Sunday. \u201cIn a situation of awareness of the hidden danger, were measures adopted to evacuate the masses? Were related safety measures promptly put in place?\u201d<\/p>\n The Beijing News, an aggressive commercial newspaper, suggested that the lack of sufficient warning might have contributed to the death toll.<\/p>\n \u201cAccording to already public information, from 3 a.m. when the leak happened to 10:30 a.m., in the space of more than seven hours, the company and even the local government it seems were only busy with handling the leak,\u201d the paper\u00a0said<\/a>\u00a0in a commentary Monday. \u201cNo warning to evacuate residents has been seen, and from news reports, many residents regarded this as a sudden disaster with no chance to prepare. This perhaps is a reason for the large toll of dead and injured.\u201d [Source<\/a><\/strong>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n A report from the Wall Street Journal looks at how poor planning in the midst of hasty urbanization could be to blame for last week’s disaster<\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n [State Administration of Work Safety director] Yang [Dongliang] said the problems included how the pipeline and the city’s sewage and underground cable systems had become intertwined. But he also cited “negligence of duty of pipeline supervision and unprofessional handling of oil leakage before the blasts.”<\/p>\n […] Qingdao’s rapid urbanization and fast-paced industrialization illustrates the challenges that China’s leaders face in planning for economic growth. Qingdao’s population jumped to 8.5 million in 2010 from 6.3 million in 1986.<\/p>\n In 2011, Qingdao completed a 17-mile bridge across Jiaozhou Bay to alleviate traffic that choked a highway that curved around the bay. That structure connects its downtown with the district of Huangdao, where Friday’s explosions occurred, and accelerated Huangdao’s development.<\/p>\n “I wonder why so many factories and companies have been built in the area, and why people are being directly exposed to pollution and explosions,” said a Huangdao resident calling herself Xiao Rou on her microblog. “Why doesn’t the government take measures?\u2026I hope the government can give us a safe home.” [Source<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n