{"id":170150,"date":"2014-03-12T17:12:27","date_gmt":"2014-03-13T00:12:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/?p=170150"},"modified":"2014-03-12T18:11:44","modified_gmt":"2014-03-13T01:11:44","slug":"chinese-microbloggers-reveal-systematic-militarization-tibet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2014\/03\/chinese-microbloggers-reveal-systematic-militarization-tibet\/","title":{"rendered":"Microbloggers Reveal Militarization in Tibet"},"content":{"rendered":"
Earlier this week, human rights and cultural preservation NGO International Campaign for Tibet published “‘Has Life Here Always Been Like This?’: Chinese Microbloggers Reveal Systematic Militarization in Tibet<\/a>.” Divided into three parts, plus a methodology and overview of Sina Weibo, the report contains censored microblog comments and images from Chinese tourists in Tibet. With analysis and additional context, the collection\u00a0reveals intensified\u00a0militarization\u00a0and government efforts to control information in the restive and highly sensitive region<\/strong><\/a>. From ICT’s introduction:<\/p>\n Social media messages posted by Chinese tourists visiting Tibetan regions have provided a revealing window into Chinese policies in Tibet. The messages recovered by ICT provide further evidence of the large-scale security personnel deployments that have increasingly become part of the Tibetan landscape since the\u00a0widespread Tibetan protests of 2008<\/a>, followed by what now numbers\u00a0more than 125 self-immolations<\/a>. These observations counter the\u00a0portrayal by Chinese officials and state media<\/a>\u00a0of a tranquil and grateful Tibetan population.<\/p>\n The messages highlight the disparate security conditions under which Tibetan and Chinese people live in the People\u2019s Republic of China, with Tibetans treated with greater suspicion and\u00a0targeted for even low-level information sharing<\/a>.<\/p>\n Under China\u2019s system for\u00a0stability maintenance<\/a>, or\u00a0weiwen<\/em>, authorities have implemented an extensive security apparatus and show overwhelming force in order to \u201cmaintain harmony and stability in Tibet<\/a>.\u201d At the same time, the Chinese government has sought to suppress the dissemination of accurate news from Tibet[1]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0through censorship and restrictions on foreign tourists.<\/p>\n Chinese authorities go to great lengths to censor the information available in the PRC. They have implemented\u00a0measures that stretch across all forms of media<\/a>, including responding to the ever-shifting landscape of the Internet with what is often called the\u00a0Great Firewall<\/a>. Even the fast-pace and diffuse dynamic of online social media have not allowed it to evade the grasp of authorities, who are becoming increasingly more adept at imposing\u00a0measures that curb social media activity<\/a>. This crackdown has resulted in a decrease of Weibo users and a shift to other platforms, such as WeChat.<\/p>\n Despite authorities\u2019 efforts to censor to crack down on social media, ICT was able to collect hundreds of\u00a0images and messages<\/a>\u00a0from the popular Chinese microblogging site,\u00a0Sina Weibo<\/a>, using the crowd-sourced perspective of Chinese tourists to further document the harsh security measures implemented in Tibet by Chinese authorities. […] [Source<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Also see ICT’s visual analysis slideshow<\/a>, or their full collection of images and text<\/a>. The report can also be downloaded as a .pdf<\/a>.<\/p>\n The information presented by ICT stands in contrast to official Chinese media portrayal of the situation, which has long focused on close relations between Tibetans and Han<\/a> in western China. After the Dalai Lama’s recent visit to Washington\u2014which included a sit down with Barack Obama<\/a> and a prayer delivery to the U.S. Senate<\/a>\u2014the Tibetan chairman of the TAR People’s Congress reiterated ethnic harmony, blamed the Dalai Lama for recent self-immolations, and emphasized local authorities’ continued opposition to engaging<\/a> with the exiled high monk.<\/p>\n