{"id":188345,"date":"2015-11-10T14:16:41","date_gmt":"2015-11-10T22:16:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/?p=188345"},"modified":"2016-10-13T22:55:09","modified_gmt":"2016-10-14T05:55:09","slug":"sensitive-words-the-two-child-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2015\/11\/sensitive-words-the-two-child-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"Sensitive Words: The Two-Child Policy"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sensitive Words highlights keywords that are blocked from Sina Weibo search results. CDT independently tests the keywords before posting them, but some searches later become accessible again. We welcome readers to contribute to this project so that we can include the most up-to-date information. Use the form at the bottom of this post to help us crowd source sensitive words. You can also\u00a0browse our\u00a0archive of sensitive words<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

The economic reality of raising children<\/a> in China has muted the reaction to the end of the one-child policy. All married couples may now have two children, but the financial pressure of child-rearing and lack of support for working parents<\/a> discourage many from having a second child.<\/p>\n

On WeChat, popular science writer Tang Yinghong argues that, without a say in this or any other policy that affects their lives, the public is bound to feel indifferent<\/a><\/strong>:<\/p>\n

From a psychological perspective, the divergent reactions of different age groups to the power-monopolizing clique\u2019s new policy demonstrate that the policy hasn\u2019t received the broad approval and enthusiastic welcome that was expected. This is because the policy doesn\u2019t reflect popular will and didn\u2019t include public participation. The entire roll-out of the policy was decided by the power-monopolizing clique behind closed doors. The logic of policy-making still regards the masses as\u00a0a tool\u00a0to satisfy the goals of the governing clique, not as people enjoying rights and equality. Faced head-on with the aging of society, the social security promised by the power clique is on the verge of bankruptcy; with\u00a0the \u201cpopulation dividend of reduced human rights\u201d model of economic growth reaching its end and the labor force no longer able to power GDP growth, they come up with the \u201ctwo-child policy.\u201d Their goal is clearly to sustain \u201cstability maintenance<\/a>,\u201d to keep the water flowing to\u00a0the fish farm, not to accept good advice or follow the will of the people.\u00a0<\/span>[Chinese<\/a><\/strong>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Tang’s essay is still available on WeChat, but the combined search terms\u00a0Tang Yinghong + policy (\u5510\u6620\u7ea2\uff0b\u653f\u7b56) <\/strong>are now blocked on Weibo, as are\u00a0family planning + human rights (<\/strong>\u8ba1\u5212\u751f\u80b2\uff0b\u4eba\u6743)<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Tang frequently tackles politically sensitive subjects, like “Under the Dome,” the viral TED-style documentary on smog<\/a>\u00a0that was viewed hundreds of millions of times before it was deleted<\/a> from video sharing websites.\u00a0A selection of Tang’s essays are archived at CDT Chinese<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Have a sensitive word tip? Submit it through this form:<\/em><\/p>\n