{"id":190376,"date":"2016-01-28T16:49:46","date_gmt":"2016-01-29T00:49:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/?p=190376"},"modified":"2016-01-28T17:33:21","modified_gmt":"2016-01-29T01:33:21","slug":"couples-lawsuit-first-test-for-same-sex-marriage-in-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2016\/01\/couples-lawsuit-first-test-for-same-sex-marriage-in-china\/","title":{"rendered":"Couple\u2019s Lawsuit First Test for Same-Sex Marriage in China"},"content":{"rendered":"
On January 5, the Furong district court in Changsha, Hunan\u00a0accepted Sun Wenlin’s case against the municipal civil affairs bureau for denying him the right to marry his same-sex partner<\/a>. This lawsuit will become the first marriage equality case to be heard by a Chinese court, and some in the legal and LGBT communities welcomed the visibility of the pending trial as a victory. At The New York Times, Edward Wong and Vanessa Piao report on the difficulty Sun faced finding legal representation and getting the case accepted<\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n Getting the lawsuit accepted by the Changsha Furong District People\u2019s Court was not easy. The couple found a lawyer who agreed to take the case but then dropped it after his firm objected. That lawyer recommended Shi Fulong, whom the couple hired and who filed the case in the court on Dec. 16.<\/p>\n A court employee refused to accept the paperwork at first, but Mr. Shi pointed to new regulations passed in May that made it tougher for courts to reject cases without giving a strong reason.<\/p>\n […]\u00a0The first hearing was scheduled for Thursday, but the couple\u2019s lawyer heard Tuesday that it had been postponed indefinitely because a lawyer representing the civil affairs bureau was busy, Mr. Sun said.<\/p>\n He added that the judge had called him the same day and said, \u201cThe hearing will be the day after tomorrow \u2014 are you O.K. with private information becoming public?\u201d Mr. Sun said he was fine with that, and the judge then called Mr. Hu to ask the same thing.<\/p>\n The district court and the local police unit could not be reached for comment on Wednesday.<\/p>\n Mr. Sun said the case had cost them about $1,200 so far, nearly three times what each of them earns in a month. But he said they were determined to see it through to the end. [Source<\/a><\/strong>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n At her China Law and Policy blog, Elizabeth M. Lynch provides further details about the new case filing regulations mentioned above, describes the bravery of lawyer Shi Fulong<\/strong><\/a> amid attacks by state media and in the context of Beijing’s ongoing\u00a0crackdown on rights lawyers and legal advocacy<\/a>, and explains why the case’s acceptance may not hint that China is ready to allow marriage equality:<\/p>\n […S]tarting in May 2015, that calculus [that a controversial case making it past the Case Filing Division signaled a good sign for the plaintiff] may no longer apply. Likely sensing that denying access to the courts is not the best way to raise the people\u2019s confidence in their court system, in early 2015, the Supreme People\u2019s Court (\u201cSPC\u201d) made reform of the Case Filing Division a major focus of its agenda. On May 1, 2015,\u00a0new regulations<\/a>\u00a0on case filing took effect.<\/p>\n Under the new regulations, the Case Filing Division no longer \u201creviews\u201d any of the merits of the case. Rather it\u2019s role is just to \u201cregister\u201d the complaint after the Division ensures that the complaint is compliant with the technical aspects of the law. Decisions whether to register the complaint are encouraged to be made \u201con the spot\u201d (SPC Case Filing Regs<\/a>, Art. 2 & 8). […]<\/p>\n\n
\n