{"id":202660,"date":"2017-09-22T23:00:25","date_gmt":"2017-09-23T06:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/?p=202660"},"modified":"2017-09-25T23:12:08","modified_gmt":"2017-09-26T06:12:08","slug":"rights-lawyers-hit-new-wave-intimidation-coercion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2017\/09\/rights-lawyers-hit-new-wave-intimidation-coercion\/","title":{"rendered":"Rights Lawyers Hit by New Wave of Intimidation"},"content":{"rendered":"
Two years into the escalated crackdown on rights lawyers that began on "Black Friday"<\/a> in July 2015, Human Rights Watch highlights a series of inspections of Chinese law firms by the Ministry of Justice<\/strong><\/a> in recent weeks, ostensibly meant to "strengthen" and "standardize" their supervision. The group’s warning follows a speech by Justice Minister Zhang Jun calling for \u201charsh discipline, but much love,\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cWhile China\u2019s human rights lawyers are no strangers to official harassment, these sudden, invasive probes send an alarming message,\u201d said Sophie Richardson, China director at Human Rights Watch. \u201cYet again, China\u2019s authorities are putting lawyers on notice that they are subject to the whims of the government.\u201d<\/p>\n [\u2026] The new round of intimidation against law firms raises concerns of a renewed crackdown on human rights lawyers, said Human Rights Watch. The lawyers interviewed described their interviews with authorities as intimidating. Said one lawyer: \u201cIt made me worried. They didn\u2019t use strongly worded language, but they asked about my parents and my children. This is unusual as I don\u2019t know them well at all\u2026[so] it made me feel scared.\u201d Another lawyer said that an official said threateningly: \u201cThere are lot of problems with your firm,\u201d but gave no details about the problems or how they would be resolved. Authorities told one firm that the lawyers would be required to sign some kind of pledge, but again without details. <\/p>\n China\u2019s Bureaus of Justice, under article 52 of the Lawyers\u2019 Law, have the right to \u201cconduct routine supervision and management\u201d of lawyers and law firms. The supervisory powers under article 64 of the Management Methods on Law Firms are broad and vaguely defined, and permit the examination of firms\u2019 \u201ccompliance with laws, rules, and regulations\u201d and their \u201cinternal management.\u201d The bureaus are not required to apply a set procedure before subjecting the firms to these investigations. The Management Methods also explicitly require lawyers and law firms to \u201csupport the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party,\u201d and to establish Party branches in law firms. Lawyers are prohibited from expressing opinions that \u201creject the fundamental political system\u201d of China or may \u201cendanger national security.\u201d [Source<\/a><\/strong>] <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Radio Free Asia’s Gao Shan and Ping Chen reported another official visit to one firm<\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n The search on the office of Mo Shaoping, a prominent Beijing lawyer known for defending sensitive human rights cases, was conducted by the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Justice, a source with knowledge of the case told RFA’s Mandarin Service.<\/p>\n "The searching personnel were led by about 10 Beijing local district judicial office managers,\u201d the source said. \u201cThe purpose of the search was to begin what will probably be a 10-day \u2018Special Inspection\u2019 before the 19th Party Congress," RFA’s source said.<\/p>\n [\u2026] The search of the office of Mo, a lawyer of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo who died of liver cancer in July, was aimed at "examining if all government rules and regulations are followed in the management and operation of the law firm,\u201d the source said.<\/p>\n However, Beijing-based right lawyer Li Jinglin told RFA on Monday that \u201cthe so-called \u2018Special Inspection\u2019 is of course not targeting all law firms in Beijing. Mo Shaoping’s office always represents sensitive cases and clients, so he was singled out.\u201d [Source<\/a><\/strong>] <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n RFA reported other measures against lawyers involved in politically sensitive cases last week<\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n Zhu Shengwu, who represented defendant Wang Jiangfeng after he used Xi’s nickname "steamed buns" online, said he has been told he is under a disciplinary investigation, meaning that his license to practice law could be revoked at a hearing on Sept. 21.<\/p>\n "The investigation didn’t directly touch on the Wang Jiangfeng case, but I think that’s what this is about," Zhu told RFA on Wednesday. "Because they shut down my access to social media after my defense statement."<\/p>\n [\u2026] The ruling Chinese Communist Party recently ordered dozens of lawyers to endorse a "declaration" accepting further controls on the legal profession at a compulsory "symposium" in Beijing in late August.<\/p>\n More than 70 lawyers with a history of defending vulnerable groups in cases considered politically sensitive by the government were told to attend, where they were told that a "Western-style" separation of powers and judicial independence isn’t suited to China.<\/p>\n Among those ordered to attend were the former attorney of late Nobel peace laureate and political prisoner Liu Xiaobo, as well as lawyers who represented the families of children who died or were made sick by the 2008 tainted baby milk scandal, and those who defended fellow lawyers in the July 2015 crackdown. [Source<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n On Friday, Hong Kong Free Press’ Catherine Lai reported another instance of the long-running obstruction<\/a> of lawyers’ efforts to defend their detained colleagues: authorities’ refusal to allow family appointed lawyers to meet with Wang Quanzhang<\/strong><\/a>. <\/p>\n Wang\u2019s family and friends have not heard from him since he disappeared on August 3, 2015 as part of a sweeping crackdown on human rights lawyers, legal staff and activists in the summer of 2015. He is still being held in detention, with a trial yet to take place.<\/p>\n A lawyer at the Fengrui law firm, which saw many of its staff detained in the crackdown, Wang had worked on the cases of Falun Gong practitioners, investigative journalists and democracy advocates.<\/p>\n Lawyers Cheng Hai and Lin Qilei, who were hired to represent Wang by his family, requested a meeting with their client on Wednesday morning at the detention centre in Tianjin where he is being held, but staff turned down their request. [Source<\/strong><\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Wang was recently shortlisted for the Dutch Foreign Ministry’s Human Rights Tulip Award<\/a>, with a worldwide public vote carrying him to the final three<\/a>. The final selection will be made by the Netherlands’ Minister for Foreign Affairs by December 8. <\/p>\n China’s Ministry of Justice may have failed to scrutinize its own ranks with the same vigor as it is reportedly inspecting lawyers’. As South China Morning Post’s Wang Xiangwei wrote last weekend, it fell to the Party’s Central Commission for Discipline Inspection to identify Lu Enguang, who reportedly purchased business and official positions, academic qualifications, and a seven-year age reduction, all while fathering a regulation-breaching seven children and becoming head of the Ministry’s political department, with a seat on its leading party group and the rank of deputy minister. "That a con artist could rise to the heart of China\u2019s justice system is truly mind boggling<\/a>," Wang observed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Two years into the escalated crackdown on rights lawyers that began on "Black Friday" in July 2015, Human Rights Watch highlights a series of inspections of Chinese law firms by the Ministry of Justice in recent weeks, ostensibly meant to "strengthen" and "standardize" their supervision. The group’s warning follows a speech by Justice Minister Zhang […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":962,"featured_media":202358,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[34,10,14744,14745,14746,100,5,1051],"tags":[3146,3041,8063,3427,15579,17393],"class_list":["post-202660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-human-rights","category-law","category-level-2-article","category-level-3-article","category-level-4-article","category-politics","category-society","category-top-article","tag-lawyers","tag-legal-system","tag-ministry-of-justice","tag-mo-shaoping","tag-rights-lawyers","tag-wang-quanzhang","et-has-post-format-content","et_post_format-et-post-format-standard"],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\n
\n
\n