{"id":235960,"date":"2021-11-22T15:25:30","date_gmt":"2021-11-22T23:25:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/?p=235960"},"modified":"2021-11-26T17:46:07","modified_gmt":"2021-11-27T01:46:07","slug":"sinopsis-hijacking-the-mainstream-ccp-influence-agencies-in-italian-parliamentary-and-local-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2021\/11\/sinopsis-hijacking-the-mainstream-ccp-influence-agencies-in-italian-parliamentary-and-local-politics\/","title":{"rendered":"Sinopsis: Hijacking The Mainstream\u2014CCP Influence Agencies in Italian Parliamentary and Local Politics"},"content":{"rendered":"
The following article is reposted from Project Sinopsis<\/a>, with permission:<\/p>\n Summary of findings and recommendations<\/strong><\/p>\n Recent controversy on the overt alignment of some senior Italian politicians with Chinese Communist Party (CCP<\/strong>) talking points has attracted overdue attention, yet failed to expose the broader phenomenon behind it: the party\u2019s centrally-guided efforts to shape policy and public opinion by influencing \u00e9lite figures across Italy\u2019s political spectrum, an instance of its global influence work<\/strong>.<\/p>\n This paper provides the first overview of the Italian activity of external influence agencies<\/strong> across the systems that compose the CCP-led apparatus, including three case studies that illustrate multi-system operations targeting Italian politics from the national to the municipal level. The CCP International Liaison Department (ILD<\/strong>), the Chinese Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries (CPAFFC<\/strong>), the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade (CCPIT<\/strong>), as well as units in the party\u2019s propaganda<\/strong> and united front<\/strong> systems and fronts linked to intelligence<\/strong> agencies, the cases show, are key actors in efforts to coopt parliamentarians, political parties, local officials and mainstream voices in think tanks and the media.<\/p>\n Using politicians, lobbyists and other local intermediaries as proxies, these operations repurpose democratic institutions as instruments of CCP policy. Vague appeals to \u2018friendship\u2019, \u2018culture\u2019 and trade help enlist mainstream, often CCP-critical figures as unwitting endorsers of a discourse-engineering endeavour: the installation of propaganda memes that normalise the CCP\u2019s totalitarian rule and global expansion. Surrendering policy-making creativity to this new common sense<\/strong>, parliamentary circles have relayed propaganda whitewashing the party\u2019s human rights abuses, while local governments joined a \u2018Belt and Road\u2019-themed network set up by a CCP influence agency.<\/p>\n The knowledge asymmetry<\/strong> between CCP influence agencies and their targets is a vulnerability these operations exploit. Unfamiliarity with influence agencies and tactics compromises the integrity of political institutions by making them easy cooption targets. Effective policy-making towards a balanced relationship with China requires knowledge of CCP influence work.<\/p>\n Policy-makers have tools at their disposal to address these vulnerabilities.<\/p>\nHijacking the mainstream: CCP influence agencies and their operations in Italian parliamentary and local politics<\/h3>\n
\n