{"id":238987,"date":"2022-03-21T17:57:09","date_gmt":"2022-03-22T00:57:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/?p=238987"},"modified":"2022-04-19T17:11:42","modified_gmt":"2022-04-20T00:11:42","slug":"interview-laura-murphy-on-forced-labor-in-xinjiang","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2022\/03\/interview-laura-murphy-on-forced-labor-in-xinjiang\/","title":{"rendered":"Interview: Laura Murphy on Forced Labor in Xinjiang"},"content":{"rendered":"
Evidence of human rights abuses against Uyghurs and other ethnic groups in Xinjiang has significantly increased over the past five years. As documented by researchers and human rights groups, the Chinese government has subjected members of these ethnic groups to <\/span>widespread surveillance<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>arbitrary detention<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>torture<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>sexual violence<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>forced sterilization<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>forced labor<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>family separation<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>religious discrimination<\/span><\/a>, and <\/span>linguistic assimilation<\/span><\/a>. The accumulated evidence is strong enough for <\/span>various governments<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>human rights groups<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>independent experts<\/span><\/a>, and the <\/span>Uyghur Tribunal<\/span><\/a> to have concluded that it amounts to <\/span>crimes against humanity, if not genocide<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Among these abuses, <\/span>forced labor<\/span><\/a> has played a particularly vital role in <\/span>catalyzing global condemnation<\/span><\/a>, not only due to moral revulsion and potential breach of China\u2019s <\/span>international legal obligations<\/span><\/a>, but also by revealing how these human rights issues tangibly relate to international actors. Consumers and shareholders alike have gradually discovered that their own <\/span>consumption and investments substantially contribute to these abuses<\/span><\/a>. As research has shown, the majority of global supply chains in the <\/span>cotton<\/span><\/a> and <\/span>solar panel<\/span><\/a> industries are tainted by forced labor emanating from Xinjiang. However, despite this well-documented evidence, it remains unclear to what extent international actors are willing to <\/span>put people over profits<\/span><\/a>, what <\/span>impediments<\/span><\/a> they face, and how their efforts might change the situation on the ground.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Joining CDT to discuss the issue of forced labor in Xinjiang is Laura Murphy, Professor of Human Rights and Contemporary Slavery at the Helena Kennedy Centre for International Justice at Sheffield Hallam University in the UK. She is a co-author of the following reports on this topic: \u201c<\/span>Laundering Cotton: How Xinjiang Cotton Is Obscured in International Supply Chains<\/span><\/a>\u201d; \u201c<\/span>In Broad Daylight: Uyghur Forced Labour and Global Supply Chains<\/span><\/a>\u201d; and most recently, \u201c<\/span>Financing Genocide: Development Finance and the Crisis in the Uyghur Region<\/span><\/a>.\u201d Our interview touches on the evidence and motivations around forced labor in Xinjiang, the complexity of international supply chain due diligence, the relevance of global cases of forced labor, and the methodological challenges of documenting human rights abuses in Xinjiang. The interview was lightly edited for length and clarity.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n China Digital Times (CDT)<\/strong>: <\/span>How and when did you begin working on forced labor in Xinjiang? Have you worked on issues related to forced labor in China before?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n Laura Murphy (LM)<\/strong>: I’ve been working on forced labor globally for over 15 years. I turned my sights to researching forced labor in Xinjiang as soon as news broke in December 2018 that the PRC had started including factory work in internment camp settings. I lived in the Uyghur Region in the 2000s, so I felt compelled to shift my focus to that region when this news emerged. But I want to be sure to mention that I worked with a team of extraordinary researchers from around the world on this report, all of whom brought their own indispensable expertise and skill sets to the work.<\/span><\/p>\n CDT<\/strong>: <\/span>If you could have one person in the world read your reports on forced labor in Xinjiang, who would it be, and why? More broadly, who\u2019s your audience for these papers? What\u2019s their intended use?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n LM<\/strong>: Our intended audience for our reports is a combination of corporations, investors, legislators, Uyghur community activists, and others concerned about forced labor. We try to make the reports useful for academic and general audiences alike. We hope that the reports will raise awareness of the issue, provide an evidential base for understanding forced labor in the region, exemplify the way Uyghur forced labor affects global supply chains, and influence both corporations and governments to stop supporting human rights abuses in the region.<\/span><\/p>\n CDT<\/strong>: <\/span>Can you describe the range of evidence you assembled, from prisoner testimonies to state media reports and corporate PR claims? How did you assess the credibility of this evidence?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n LM<\/strong>: In this report, we addressed four different kinds of questions with different types of evidence to provide a more complete portrait of forced labor in the cotton industry in XUAR [Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region]. We assembled first-person testimonies of people who (or people whose family members) have been forced to work in the sector to better understand the individual experience of forced labor. We then reviewed Chinese government and corporate publicity campaigns and annual reports to understand the larger strategies that make forced labor possible in the region, and the ways the government justifies it. We then analyzed trade and customs data to see how Uyghur forced labor affects our supply chains. And then we analyzed the current legal context to understand what protections we can rely on globally to fight this.<\/span><\/p>\n CDT<\/strong>: <\/span>Can you describe how \u201cpoverty alleviation\u201d programs in Xinjiang differ from those elsewhere in China, and how despite their benevolent-sounding name they are actually coercive?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n LM<\/strong>: While the PRC operates poverty alleviation and labor transfer programs all over China, in the Uyghur Region, refusing to participate in those government programs can be punishable by internment. It is the specter of the internment camps that makes government programs in the Uyghur Region coercive and nearly ubiquitous. It’s the worst system of contemporary forced labor I’ve ever encountered\u2014in terms of scope, scale, and severity.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n CDT<\/strong>: <\/span>One prominent response to accusations of forced labor has been to highlight the level of mechanization in Xinjiang\u2019s cotton industry, arguing that this simply leaves no need for forced labor. What\u2019s wrong with this argument?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n LM<\/strong>: Mechanization has left farmers without jobs. This renders them “surplus labor” in the eyes of the state, and that status leaves them subject to coercive state-sponsored labor transfers. Minoritized citizens in the region are not allowed to refuse such transfers. When they hesitate, they are “educated” to “want” to go, until they finally relent. [The <\/span>Laundering Cotton<\/span><\/a> report addresses this question in greater depth (pp. 12-13), citing official statistics and regional differences to argue that \u201cthe majority of cotton grown in the Uyghur Region\u201d\u2014particularly for export\u2014\u201cis still hand-picked.\u201d]<\/span><\/p>\n CDT<\/strong>: <\/span>Could you draw out the capitalist underpinnings of forced labor in Xinjiang? The CCP might have been satisfied by detaining ethnic minorities and subjecting them to a pervasive surveillance state in order to neutralize a perceived threat, but why impose a further punishment of forced labor?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n LM<\/strong>: It’s not so much capitalist as ideological, political, and cultural. Government directives clearly indicate that the purpose of the programs is to transform the Uyghur people from supposedly being \u201cbackwards\u201d and \u201clazy\u201d to being more like Han Chinese people. It is meant to \u201curbanize\u201d the population and to move them to cities where the state can better control their behaviors and religious practices. It is designed to control Uyghurs and to make them docile workers in the larger project of industrialization and Sinicization of the region.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n CDT<\/strong>: <\/span>What are some of the most interesting or overlooked findings you have come across in your research on Xinjiang forced labor so far? Has anything surprised you?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n LM<\/strong>: I think the most surprising result of our work is actually the responses companies have provided to our findings. Many of them simply take their suppliers’ word that they are not using forced labor. Many of them choose to believe, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that their company is the one exception, or that their suppliers couldn’t possibly be engaged in forced labor. Many companies prefer to look away. And both companies and their auditors are often unwilling to investigate aspects of supply chains that would force them to face the reality of their complicity in forced labor, or that would put them in bad standing with the Chinese government.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n CDT<\/strong>: <\/span>What are some ways international companies attempt to conceal their connections to Xinjiang forced labor in their supply chains, even while proclaiming to perform what on the surface sounds like due diligence?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n LM<\/strong>: Companies often accept simple self-answered questionnaires, protocols, and codes of conduct as proof that suppliers don’t use forced labor, without doing the due diligence to investigate thoroughly. Most companies do not know where the raw materials for their products come from, and so it can be less about concealing and more about plausible deniability. Our work is aimed at removing some of the plausibility of those denials.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n