{"id":40079,"date":"2009-06-04T00:56:17","date_gmt":"2009-06-04T07:56:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/?p=40079"},"modified":"2009-06-04T00:56:17","modified_gmt":"2009-06-04T07:56:17","slug":"wuer-kaixi-prosperity-cant-erase-tiananmen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chinadigitaltimes.net\/2009\/06\/wuer-kaixi-prosperity-cant-erase-tiananmen\/","title":{"rendered":"Wu’er Kaixi: Prosperity Can’t Erase Tiananmen"},"content":{"rendered":"
\u00a0Tiananmen student leader Wu’er Kaixi writes for\u00a0the Wall Street Journal<\/strong> <\/a>about the impact of Tiananmen and the trade-off for economic growth:<\/p>\n The crime we committed in 1989 was to hope for change. In 1919, students campaigned for change, for a China that was genuinely part of the modern world. In 1989, we did the same. In 2009, change has come to China. It is a country awash with foreign investment, a country that is superficially the same place in which readers of this newspaper live. I have not seen it with my own eyes, but I know that China today has 7-Elevens and Metros and malls and discos and outlets for Italian brand names; even Hooters. China has walked in space.<\/p>\n In part, the change we hoped for has happened. When the people of Beijing took to the streets in 1989 — however people might read it today — they were acting out of frustration. In 1989, when I went into exile, I said the reason for the protests initially was that China’s youth wanted Nikes and wanted to be able to go to a bar with their girlfriends. Such things were not possible in the China I grew up in. They are possible today, largely because China’s university students rose up in 1989 and the workers’ unions and the common people joined them. The government realized it had no choice but to liberalize the economy if it was going to keep popular discontent at bay.<\/p>\n In short, 20 years on, I believe the protests in 1989 were a kind of tragic success. China got its Nikes and discos. Unfortunately, China did not get the other change we yearned for — political reform. For many years, I have been of the opinion that a deal was struck with the people of China. The deal was economic prosperity in exchange for political quiescence and continued and unchallenged one-party rule. For years, I have been describing it as a “lousy deal.” But today, on the anniversary of the bloodshed that ended the protests, I would like to add that it is also an illusory deal.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Wu’er Kaixi is one of many\u00a0activists that\u00a0have been blocked\u00a0<\/a>or suppressed before the anniversary as he tries to make his way back to China. From the Seattle Times<\/strong> <\/a>via the New York Times and the Associated Press:\u00a0<\/p>\n Wu’er Kaixi, one of the principal student leaders of the 1989 pro-democracy movement, flew Wednesday from Taiwan to the Chinese territory of Macau, saying he wanted to surrender to Chinese authorities after two decades in exile.<\/p>\n Immigration officers pulled Wu’er aside and demanded he fly back to Taiwan, something he vowed to resist.<\/p>\n Wu’er said in a statement issued through a friend that he wants to surrender to Chinese authorities so he can visit his parents, who haven’t been allowed to leave China.<\/p>\n “When I turn myself in, I will use the platform of a Chinese courtroom to debate the Chinese government about this incident,” he said. “My turning myself in should not be interpreted as my admission that my behavior 20 years ago is illegal and wrong. I want to reassert here the Chinese government bears complete and undeniable moral, political and legal responsibility for the tragedy that happened in China in 1989,” his statement said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n