Philip Bowring: Chinese Exceptionalism

In the New York Times, Philip Bowring writes that while much of the world has “chafed against” U.S. exceptionalism in the global economic order, in fact enjoys an exceptionalism that is contributing to global economic imbalances:

For sure, the has been in an exceptional position and one that has enabled it to consume more than is good for it. Many countries, with China the most vociferous, wish for a more balanced world in which other currencies play significant roles in trade finance, capital flows and exchange reserves.

But while the cries against U.S. privileges ring out loud and clear, scant notice is taken of the exceptionalism successfully pursued by China. Beijing has so far insisted on maintaining both a pegged and controls on capital flows.

All of North America, Europe and Japan have no controls on capital flows and have fluctuating exchange rates. Ditto for South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, South Africa and most of trade-oriented . India has some exchange controls but a floating currency, which is also the norm in South America.

This exceptionalism has helped China accumulate over $1 trillion in , that it naturally thinks should give it clout in the world. But where would China be if that exceptionalism were removed?

Open popup
X

Welcome back!

CDT is a non-profit media site, and we need your support. Your contribution will help us provide more translations, breaking news, and other content you love.