The commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific says China’s interest in developing an aircraft carrier fleet is ‘understandable,’ and that the United States would be willing to help. Admiral Timothy Keating made the comment during a wide-ranging news conference in Beijing Saturday morning. From Voice of America:
Admiral Keating says he believes Chinese leaders are “intrigued” by the idea of having aircraft carriers. But he says they need to understand the impact such a powerful, mobile weapon system can have.
“An aircraft carrier from a country pulls into port, and it is an unmistakable demonstration of will and resolve,” he said. “And we had a very good conversation about that. I do not have any better idea as to China’s intentions to develop, or not, a carrier program, but we had a very pleasant and candid exchange about the larger issues attendant to a carrier program.”
At a lunch Friday with China’s navy chief, Vice Admiral Wu Shengli, Admiral Keating stressed the difficulty and complexity of developing, building and operating an aircraft carrier. But at his news conference Saturday Keating said the United States would be willing to help if that is what China decides to do.
“It is not an area where we would want any tension to arise unnecessarily,” he added. “And we would, if they choose to develop [an aircraft carrier program] help them to the degree that they seek and the degree that we’re capable, in developing their programs.” [Full Text]
Read this comment on Observing Japan:
With the US offering help to the PLAN in developing aircraft carriers, does anyone still think that the region’s security environment can be neatly summarized as the US seeking to build up a coalition to contain China?
I think Keating’s suggestion contains a certain logic. US help in building a blue-water navy reinforces the idea that a Chinese blue-water navy need not be a threat to US interests, because the US and China share an interest in keeping maritime Asia stable and open.
I wonder, though, what Japan thinks about Keating’s offer.
