Newsnight: The Unaired Voldemort Debate

After comparing each other’s countries to Harry Potter nemesis Voldemort, the Chinese and Japanese ambassadors to the U.K. appeared on the BBC’s Newsnight last week. The two sat apart, and separately discussed historical grievances and disputed islands with host Jeremy Paxman, but Weibo user @maboyong imagined how a face-to-face showdown might have run (via Liz Carter):

horcrux01
Liu Xiaoming: Japanese militarism is like Voldemort, and the Yasukuni Shrine is its horcrux. Those who love peace ought to guard against its reincarnation.

horcrux02

Keiichi Hayashi: The function of a horcrux is only to store a part of a dark wizard’s soul. It plays no part in reincarnation. Your analogy doesn’t work.

horcrux03

Liu: Then how do you account for Voldemort’s appearance on the back of Professor Quirrel’s head?

horcrux04

Hayashi: Professor Quirrel can in no way be considered a kind of horcrux.

horcrux05

Liu: But the entity attached to Quirrel’s body was one of the seven parts of Voldemort’s soul. So strictly speaking, one could consider him a horcrux.

horcrux06

Hayashi: “Horcrux” should refer to an object of some kind. Like a diary, a ring, a locket, a golden cup, a diadem, or something.

horcrux07

Liu: So what about Nagini? She was a snake.

horcrux08

Hayashi: A snake has no intelligence. One could classify it as a kind of object.

horcrux09

Liu: And Harry Potter? He also contained a part of Voldemort’s soul. Could he not also be considered a horcrux?

horcrux10

Hayashi: That was only an accident. Voldemort’s own Avada Kedavra spell rebounded, ripping his soul apart and placing part of it in Harry Potter’s body. It was by no means deliberate…

horcrux11

Jeremy Paxman: Let’s get back to the Diaoyu Islands dispute… [Source]

Read more about China-Japan relations.